What is a Flexible degree?
Flexible degrees can be fully online or hybrid degrees (with 75% or
more online) that make effective use of technology to offer high quality and
affordable education for students who have attended some college without
receiving college credentials, or graduate students who seek new
opportunities.
Why Flexible Degrees?
A recent analysis by the Georgetown
University Center on Education and the Workforce, Jobs and Education
Requirements through 2020 estimates Oregon will need to fill about
694,000 vacancies resulting from job creation, worker retirements and other
factors. Of these job vacancies, 480,000 will require postsecondary education
and nearly half of these vacancies will require bachelors and advanced degrees.
Only 214,000 are expected to be filled by high school graduates or dropouts.
One excellent place to begin looking for these additional graduates is in the ranks of Oregon residents who have completed some college without earning a degree. In 2011, nearly 567,000 Oregon residents fit into this category—representing more than 27.12% of the state’s adult population. If only a small portion of this group could be supported in attaining a bachelor or advanced degree, it would go a long way to helping Oregon to meet workforce needs and reach its 40-40-20 goals.
Degree attainment gaps among racial and ethnic group in Oregon are
significant (41.54% of whites vs. 15.8% Hispanic, 25-64 age group). Thus, an
important aspect of PSU’s student success strategy is ensuring that students of
color, low-income, first generation and working adults have access to and are
successful in PSU’s Flexible Degree programs.
Are Flexible Degrees part of reTHINK PSU?
Yes. reTHINK PSU is a
campus-wide effort to deliver an education that serves more students with
better outcomes, while containing costs through curricular innovation,
community engagement and effective use of technology. Flexible degrees are a way for PSU to meet the needs for some students. reTHINK PSU projects
follow a well-designed reTHINK
roadmap for developing solutions for challenges facing PSU.
We look forward to your comments.
Questions?
Please check our FAQ page or contact us at flexibledegrees@pdx.edu.
|
Showing posts with label reTHINK PSU. Show all posts
Showing posts with label reTHINK PSU. Show all posts
Monday, November 10, 2014
Monday, November 03, 2014
Shark Tank: PSU’s Experience in Academia’s Version of Reality Competition Show
Posted on Monday, November 03, 2014by Unknown with No comments
At the joint National
Associate of Land Grant and Public Universities (APLU) and Urban Serving
Universities (USU) annual conference this week I had the pleasure of
“pitching” an idea for PSU. The
competition was to showcase ideas universities had to create better alignment
between what a student learns and what employers need. The Innovation Pitch
Challenge session was modeled on the television show Shark
Tank (which I admit, I had not seen until we were selected for this
competition).
Our Idea
In September, we, along with dozens of universities,
submitted an idea. Ours was to create a professional master’s program in Industrial
Mathematics; a proposal that had been originally submitted by the mathematics
and statistics department for the Provost Challenge. PSU was
among 11 universities selected to make a pitch at the conference. Each
participant had five minutes for the presentation.
Big Thanks
Mathematics Professors Jay Gopalakrishnan and Gerardo Lafferriere were the
brains behind the idea for the program and the content of the script. Thanks also to Professor Devon Allen in the School of Theatre and Film who spent a session coaching me on how to
memorize the script (which I did and now can recite it for anyone!), and to Mark Wubbold in the President’s Office
for helping me make math flash cards of the mastery and competencies handed out
to the judges.
The Pitch
Here is my pitch. I share it because the ideas your
colleagues have for this proposal is exciting. Please note the script was not
written to be published, but to be delivered verbally.
I want to start with a
question: What does 5x5x5x5x5 equal? A
well-formulated question with a precise answer, 3125. But wait, in rare cases are problems so
easily defined or so easily solved. Imagine training that would prepare
employees already in the work place to address computationally intensive
problems in science and industry.
I have a proposal for
a professional master’s degree in industrial mathematics. A program that meets business and industry’s
need for dealing with complex, discontinuous and disruptive change. An academic
program that lies in that void between basic undergraduate math programs and
our research-focused mathematical doctoral programs. A program that takes the concepts and
fundamentals and applies them-- not to the well-formulated questions-- but
rather to identifying messy questions that exist in our knowledge-based
industries.
Think about
it--practitioners trained in logical thinking within a business setting;
employees that are able to effectively use contemporary computational and
statistical tools. A program that has
higher level skills grounded in mathematical thinking and theory, but not one
that trains someone to be a mathematician. Just last week, I had four business
dean candidates tell me that computational and analytical skills are what
employers want most.
I get this. I am not a
mathematician. My background is cartography and GIS. I have been a faculty member
for over 3 decades and my research and teaching has led me to understand how to
deal with change and complex problems.
But I have to say, had I become a practitioner early in my career I
would have so benefited from a program like this. Not only would I have had the skills to map
things, but I would have had the perspective to conceive of potential complex
interrelationships that go beyond the lines on the map.
We’ve done the math—by
working with employers we’ve identified 5 mastery areas where a student would
gain 5 competencies each to create this customized program. 5x5 in this case is
not 25. Learning is exponential —I can truthfully say it is 5 to the power of 5.
One of the most powerful forces in the world is the exponential power of
mathematics. Regardless of how knowledge
changes—there is one universal constant—math.
Employees need these skills in their back pocket.
This program is
targeted for people already with jobs as engineers, supply chain managers,
social entrepreneurs, and even cartographers.
The program will be delivered online, competency based, have no credits,
will count experience, and is learner paced.
The number one thing
employers are asking for are employees that can innovate. This program delivers
on that. We will produce practitioners with mathematical knowledge as applied
to their broader skill set. The saying
“do the math” exists for a reason. The evidence shows--Math is a constant no
matter what disruptions take place –you all know this, you’ve done the math--
at the heart of all innovation lies computational thinking.
We have the experience
to design this program in less than 12 months—Portland State has just innovated
over a dozen large-scale curricular projects in 6-12 months through a
university-wide crowdsourcing effort called rethink PSU.
We are asking for
$5,000, but wait, per each of the 5 mastery areas –do the math—5x5 --we are
asking for a total of $25,000. Thank you.
The Many Wins
Unfortunately, we did not win the competition. But we do have some wins to show for it. A number of participants and members of the
audience thought the idea our mathematics faculty had was “brilliant.”
I learned a lot about the potential this program could have for PSU, and
Gerardo’s great sense of humor helped make for a good pitch.
And, upon getting the news that we had not won, I received a great email
from mathematics saying:
“All that energy you brought to this effort has energized us
and the proposal. None of this effort was wasted. Thank you again.”
This kind of creative thinking on the part of faculty is part of PSU's DNA. My thank you to Jay, Gerardo and their colleagues!
Friday, October 03, 2014
Credit for Prior Learning
On October 2nd the Provost Challenge
#92: Giving Credit Where Credit is due held their 12th project team
meeting. As with all Provost Challenge projects,
the initial idea was conceived by faculty and staff and remains faculty/staff-driven.
The project now involves close to 100 individuals
and dozens were in attendance at the meeting.
Some have been working on the project since its inception, while others
came to learn for the first time what the effort is about.
Shelly Chabon, Associate Dean in the College of Liberal Arts
and Sciences and project #92 lead, kicked off the meeting. Mark Jones, Professor of Computer Science and
project team member “introduced us” to a 2020 PSU graduate who had just earned their degree by taking advantage of our credit for prior learning (CPL) policy. Note: The PSU Faculty Senate approved a CPL
Academic Policy Statement in April 2014.
Vice Provost Sukhwant Jhaj and I had been invited to the
meeting for a conversation around questions that have emerged as the team has
done their work. Team members were concerned
about potential impacts on departmental
loss of SCH for courses taken for CPL.
How extra workloads/compensation might be handled for faculty/departments?
Would we charge fees and how? Would
there be centralized support and administrative
budget priorities for CPL? …
These are all great questions, however, the answers are not
found through PSU’s past practices. CPL should not be thought of an isolated activity
that needs to pay for itself or one that will take away from other activities,
but rather as part of a larger eco-system of program delivery designed to
ensure high-quality, affordable, accessible degree completion. Just as CPL forces us to think differently about
the curriculum, it should also have us thinking differently about what this opportunity
means for students, faculty and staff. For example, data shows that there is a
significant population of adults that we are currently not serving that might
be interested in CPL. CPL has the potential to improve retention for certain students. It should not be a given that CPL is an add
on—it could very well replacement what we are currently doing.
The Giving Credit where Credit is Due team will benefit from
a continued campus dialog on this topic. You can follow the work of the CPL
group through their project
plan and share your views either on this blog or directly with team members.
Sunday, September 21, 2014
THE “NEW ECOLOGY OF LEARNING
Posted on Sunday, September 21, 2014by Unknown with No comments
This past Wednesday I attended 2 events that helped frame my
day. In the morning I was invited by
PSUFA (Portland State University Faculty Association) to welcome our part-time
faculty. In the afternoon I attended the
first Carnegie Conversation of the 2014-2015 academic year held by our Office of Academic Innovations (OAI). Over 100
faculty, staff, associate deans and deans came to hear Dr. Randy Bass, Vice Provost for Education and
Professor of English at Georgetown University speak about “From
Disruption to Design: the University in the New Ecology of Learning.”
Both events demonstrated the commitment our faculty
have to creating a great learning environment for our students. As I said to our part-time faculty, it is
critical that PSU support all faculty members in their teaching efforts. To our students you are their “professor” regardless
if you are full-time or part-time, have been at PSU for decades or just arrived
this academic year, or are tenured or not. In his presentation, Bass challenged us to
think about “What might the world look like in 2030?” “What will the conditions
of knowledge, technology and learning be like in 15 to 20 years?” “What will a graduate
of a university need to look like in 15-20 years?”
He contrasted the traditional
formal undergraduate curriculum as many of us know it, with experiential
learning (internships, community based learning...). He made the point that experiential learning tends
to occur at the margins of the learning environment even though we recognize
its high impact. He also spoke about
those aspects of the curriculum that distinguish (or do not distinguish) one
institution from another. He
acknowledged that 20 years ago PSU broke ground in distinguishing itself with our University
Studies program and that universities need to continue to seek new ways of
delivering instruction.
Although PSU still has work to do, reTHINK PSU
is keeping us ahead of the curve described by Bass. The keynote presentation
resonated with the recent experiences of many of our faculty and staff in the audience who are creating relevant
curriculum, looking at new methodologies of delivery and assessment,
experimenting, adapting teaching approaches, and going outside of current
comfort zones. It is clear that at PSU that faculty leadership has
continually driven curricular change, whether 20 years ago in the creation of
University Studies, or in the last year with the Provost Challenge initiatives.
This is the 16th year Portland State has
participated in Carnegie Conversations on Teaching and Learning; an initiative
that began with support through the Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of
Teaching to improve the quality of student learning and raise the visibility of scholarly approaches to teaching and learning.
The event this past week was the first
in OAI's 2014/2015 series. See http://www.pdx.edu/oai/calendar/view/calendar for more information on these and additional OAI campus events.
I hope the PSU conversations about the
relationship and juxtaposition of formal versus experiential learning, about
the use of technology, and about who our students will be in the next 15-20
years will continue. I would be
interested in hearing your thoughts on this and approaches PSU might take.
Friday, July 25, 2014
Another step in moving forward on reTHINK PSU
Posted on Friday, July 25, 2014by Unknown with No comments

Last week (July 21,
2014) Vice Provost Sukhwant Jhaj and I attended the kick-off meeting in
Washington DC for a Gates Foundation grant that PSU has received from the
Association of Public and Land-Grant Universities (APLU) and the Urban Serving
Universities (USU). You can read about
the work PSU will be engaged in related to this grant at https://www.aplu.org/page.aspx?pid=3003&srctid=1&erid=2084940
This effort is one of the first significant investments the Gates Foundation
is making in universities. Much of their
(Gates Foundation) focus and funding thus far has been at the K-12 and
community college levels. At the meeting
in DC, a Gates Foundation representative commented on how they now realize how
important the entire educational ecosystem is; that investing in universities
is an important part of that. Of course,
we all know that is true, but to have external recognition of that from an
influential (and well endowed) foundation was validating for us.
PSU was awarded one of the 7 grants because we are seen as a leader
among urban serving universities in our goals to advance student success and
student completion—creating access for students, making it affordable, and
helping them complete their degrees.
These are the foundational goals of reTHINK PSU (http://www.rethink.pdx.edu/). It is exciting to know that the work we have
articulated in creating pathways for success for students from community
colleges and creating flexible degrees that serve a range of students is seen
by others as one of the important directions for the future of higher
education.
Having said this, these grants do not just land at our feet and the
competition for this award was fierce.
Sukhwant Jhaj and Hans VanDerSchaafer did a great job in writing a
proposal that made the case for why PSU needed to be one of the 7 universities
in the country that the Gates Foundation should invest in their inaugural
effort to support universities. We
imagine that the work ahead of us will not always be easy. My guess is we will run into challenges and
divergent views on how to accomplish things, and we will need to make decisions
at times without all the information we would like to have. But, it is important that PSU be a leader in
these efforts and influence the paths of others.
I will be writing more about this effort in upcoming blogs and welcome
your thoughts on this topic and our work, now or at anytime.
Reducing Student Textbook Costs
Posted on Friday, July 25, 2014by Unknown with No comments
Reducing Student Costs: Textbooks and Course Materials
One of the goals of
reTHINK PSU is to reduce what it costs students to get a degree. I am guessing it is not news to anyone that around
the country, the cost of textbooks and other course materials have
become a major contributing factor to the financial barriers faced by students. Students at PSU are not immune to this. The
College Board estimated the 2013-14 cost for textbooks and supplies for the
average undergraduate to be $1207.
We at PSU think it is important to address textbook
affordability as one more piece of the puzzle of reducing the cost of a degree. Through the urging and leadership of our
Library Dean, Marilyn Moody, and in collaboration with the Faculty Senate and
ASPSU, we will be creating a task force in the fall to determine how PSU can
lower course material costs for PSU students.
We know there are many questions as we open up the textbook/course
materials cost can of worms: Can we really reduce costs when so much of the
cost of published material is out of our hands?
What role will faculty need to play?
Will this be an effort to tell faculty what books/resources they can and
cannot assign for their courses? Are open source materials any good? What are
the technical and policy barriers to reducing textbook cost? And, I am sure
there are other concerns and questions.
Our task force will be jointly appointed by the Provost,
Faculty Senate and ASPSU to make sure we have all perspectives
represented. We plan to launch the
task force this fall. We will provide
regular updates and a variety of ways for you to share your ideas and
comments.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)






