Showing posts with label reTHINK PSU. Show all posts
Showing posts with label reTHINK PSU. Show all posts

Monday, November 10, 2014

24 Hour Countdown for Flexible Degree Open Comment

There are 24 hours left for public commenting on all Concept Proposals for the reTHINK PSU: Flexible Degrees RFP. Proposals submitted by your colleagues include a Bachelors in Urban and Public Affairs, a Minor in Sustainability, a Degree in Sociology and a Certificate in Collaborative Governance.

You can view and comment on all Concept Proposals by visiting http://flexibledegrees.pdx.edu/. The faculty submitting proposals, the team at the Office of Academic Innovation and the Academic Leadership Team will find feedback your feedback valuable as the proposals are further developed and strengthened.
What is a Flexible degree?
Flexible degrees can be fully online or hybrid degrees (with 75% or more online) that make effective use of technology to offer high quality and affordable education for students who have attended some college without receiving college credentials, or graduate students who seek new opportunities. 

Why Flexible Degrees?
A recent analysis by the Georgetown University Center on Education and the Workforce, Jobs and Education Requirements through 2020 estimates Oregon will need to fill about 694,000 vacancies resulting from job creation, worker retirements and other factors. Of these job vacancies, 480,000 will require postsecondary education and nearly half of these vacancies will require bachelors and advanced degrees. Only 214,000 are expected to be filled by high school graduates or dropouts.

One excellent place to begin looking for these additional graduates is in the ranks of Oregon residents who have completed some college without earning a degree. In 2011, nearly 567,000 Oregon residents fit into this category—representing more than 27.12% of the state’s adult population. If only a small portion of this group could be supported in attaining a bachelor or advanced degree, it would go a long way to helping Oregon to meet workforce needs and reach its 40-40-20 goals.

Degree attainment gaps among racial and ethnic group in Oregon are significant (41.54% of whites vs. 15.8% Hispanic, 25-64 age group). Thus, an important aspect of PSU’s student success strategy is ensuring that students of color, low-income, first generation and working adults have access to and are successful in PSU’s Flexible Degree programs.

Are Flexible Degrees part of reTHINK PSU?
Yes. reTHINK PSU is a campus-wide effort to deliver an education that serves more students with better outcomes, while containing costs through curricular innovation, community engagement and effective use of technology. Flexible degrees are a way for PSU to meet the needs for some students. reTHINK PSU projects follow a well-designed reTHINK roadmap for developing solutions for challenges facing PSU.

We look forward to your comments. 

Questions? 
Please check our FAQ page or contact us at flexibledegrees@pdx.edu.

Monday, November 03, 2014

Shark Tank: PSU’s Experience in Academia’s Version of Reality Competition Show



 At the joint National Associate of Land Grant and Public Universities (APLU) and Urban Serving Universities (USU) annual conference this week I had the pleasure of “pitching” an idea for PSU.  The competition was to showcase ideas universities had to create better alignment between what a student learns and what employers need. The Innovation Pitch Challenge session was modeled on the television show Shark Tank (which I admit, I had not seen until we were selected for this competition).
Our Idea
In September, we, along with dozens of universities, submitted an idea. Ours was to create a professional master’s program in Industrial Mathematics; a proposal that had been originally submitted by the mathematics and statistics department for the Provost Challenge. PSU was among 11 universities selected to make a pitch at the conference. Each participant had five minutes for the presentation.

Big Thanks
Mathematics Professors Jay Gopalakrishnan and Gerardo Lafferriere were the brains behind the idea for the program and the content of the script.  Thanks also to Professor Devon Allen in the School of Theatre and Film who spent a session coaching me on how to memorize the script (which I did and now can recite it for anyone!), and to Mark Wubbold in the President’s Office for helping me make math flash cards of the mastery and competencies handed out to the judges.

The Pitch
Here is my pitch. I share it because the ideas your colleagues have for this proposal is exciting. Please note the script was not written to be published, but to be delivered verbally.

I want to start with a question: What does 5x5x5x5x5 equal?  A well-formulated question with a precise answer, 3125.  But wait, in rare cases are problems so easily defined or so easily solved. Imagine training that would prepare employees already in the work place to address computationally intensive problems in science and industry.

I have a proposal for a professional master’s degree in industrial mathematics.  A program that meets business and industry’s need for dealing with complex, discontinuous and disruptive change. An academic program that lies in that void between basic undergraduate math programs and our research-focused mathematical doctoral programs.  A program that takes the concepts and fundamentals and applies them-- not to the well-formulated questions-- but rather to identifying messy questions that exist in our knowledge-based industries.

Think about it--practitioners trained in logical thinking within a business setting; employees that are able to effectively use contemporary computational and statistical tools.  A program that has higher level skills grounded in mathematical thinking and theory, but not one that trains someone to be a mathematician. Just last week, I had four business dean candidates tell me that computational and analytical skills are what employers want most.

I get this. I am not a mathematician. My background is cartography and GIS. I have been a faculty member for over 3 decades and my research and teaching has led me to understand how to deal with change and complex problems.  But I have to say, had I become a practitioner early in my career I would have so benefited from a program like this.  Not only would I have had the skills to map things, but I would have had the perspective to conceive of potential complex interrelationships that go beyond the lines on the map.

We’ve done the math—by working with employers we’ve identified 5 mastery areas where a student would gain 5 competencies each to create this customized program. 5x5 in this case is not 25. Learning is exponential —I can truthfully say it is 5 to the power of 5. One of the most powerful forces in the world is the exponential power of mathematics.  Regardless of how knowledge changes—there is one universal constant—math.  Employees need these skills in their back pocket.

This program is targeted for people already with jobs as engineers, supply chain managers, social entrepreneurs, and even cartographers.  The program will be delivered online, competency based, have no credits, will count experience, and is learner paced.

The number one thing employers are asking for are employees that can innovate. This program delivers on that. We will produce practitioners with mathematical knowledge as applied to their broader skill set.  The saying “do the math” exists for a reason. The evidence shows--Math is a constant no matter what disruptions take place –you all know this, you’ve done the math-- at the heart of all innovation lies computational thinking.

We have the experience to design this program in less than 12 months—Portland State has just innovated over a dozen large-scale curricular projects in 6-12 months through a university-wide crowdsourcing effort called rethink PSU.

We are asking for $5,000, but wait, per each of the 5 mastery areas –do the math—5x5 --we are asking for a total of $25,000. Thank you.

The Many Wins
Unfortunately, we did not win the competition.  But we do have some wins to show for it.  A number of participants and members of the audience thought the idea our mathematics faculty had was “brilliant.”  I learned a lot about the potential this program could have for PSU, and Gerardo’s great sense of humor helped make for a good pitch.  And, upon getting the news that we had not won, I received a great email from mathematics saying:
“All that energy you brought to this effort has energized us and the proposal. None of this effort was wasted. Thank you again.”

This kind of creative thinking on the part of faculty is part of PSU's DNA. My thank you to Jay, Gerardo and their colleagues!



Friday, October 03, 2014

Credit for Prior Learning



On October 2nd the Provost Challenge #92: Giving Credit Where Credit is due held their 12th project team meeting.  As with all Provost Challenge projects, the initial idea was conceived by faculty and staff and remains faculty/staff-driven.  The project now involves close to 100 individuals and dozens were in attendance at the meeting.  Some have been working on the project since its inception, while others came to learn for the first time what the effort is about.

Shelly Chabon, Associate Dean in the College of Liberal Arts and Sciences and project #92 lead, kicked off the meeting.  Mark Jones, Professor of Computer Science and project team member “introduced us” to a 2020 PSU graduate who had just earned their degree by taking advantage of our credit for prior learning (CPL) policy.  Note: The PSU Faculty Senate approved a CPL Academic Policy Statement in April 2014.

Vice Provost Sukhwant Jhaj and I had been invited to the meeting for a conversation around questions that have emerged as the team has done their work.  Team members were concerned about potential impacts on departmental loss of SCH for courses taken for CPL.  How extra workloads/compensation might be handled for faculty/departments? Would we charge fees and how? Would there be centralized support and administrative budget priorities for CPL? …

These are all great questions, however, the answers are not found through PSU’s past practices. CPL should not be thought of an isolated activity that needs to pay for itself or one that will take away from other activities, but rather as part of a larger eco-system of program delivery designed to ensure high-quality, affordable, accessible degree completion.  Just as CPL forces us to think differently about the curriculum, it should also have us thinking differently about what this opportunity means for students, faculty and staff.   For example, data shows that there is a significant population of adults that we are currently not serving that might be interested in CPL. CPL has the potential to improve retention for certain students.  It should not be a given that CPL is an add on—it could very well replacement what we are currently doing. 

No doubt, there will be many more questions that arise for those units wishing to use CPL.  The questions should not present barriers, but rather help us figure out what we need to do to achieve the goals we have.  The reTHINK roadmap can help frame the conversation and help us decide what and how we do things. The roadmap asks us to articulate the outcomes we wish to achieve, determine the gaps that might exist, and to see how disruptive work plays out in our organization in order to understand what actions make sense to implement.

The Giving Credit where Credit is Due team will benefit from a continued campus dialog on this topic. You can follow the work of the CPL group through their project plan and share your views either on this blog or directly with team members.




Sunday, September 21, 2014

THE “NEW ECOLOGY OF LEARNING

This past Wednesday I attended 2 events that helped frame my day.  In the morning I was invited by PSUFA (Portland State University Faculty Association) to welcome our part-time faculty.  In the afternoon I attended the first Carnegie Conversation of the 2014-2015 academic year held by our Office of Academic Innovations (OAI). Over 100 faculty, staff, associate deans and deans came to hear Dr. Randy Bass, Vice Provost for Education and Professor of English at Georgetown University speak about “From Disruption to Design: the University in the New Ecology of Learning.”

Both events demonstrated the commitment our faculty have to creating a great learning environment for our students.  As I said to our part-time faculty, it is critical that PSU support all faculty members in their teaching efforts.  To our students you are their “professor” regardless if you are full-time or part-time, have been at PSU for decades or just arrived this academic year, or are tenured or not. In his presentation, Bass challenged us to think about “What might the world look like in 2030?” “What will the conditions of knowledge, technology and learning be like in 15 to 20 years?” “What will a graduate of a university need to look like in 15-20 years?”

He contrasted the traditional formal undergraduate curriculum as many of us know it, with experiential learning (internships, community based learning...).  He made the point that experiential learning tends to occur at the margins of the learning environment even though we recognize its high impact.  He also spoke about those aspects of the curriculum that distinguish (or do not distinguish) one institution from another.  He acknowledged that 20 years ago PSU broke ground in distinguishing itself with our University Studies program and that universities need to continue to seek new ways of delivering instruction.

Although PSU still has work to do, reTHINK PSU is keeping us ahead of the curve described by Bass.  The keynote presentation resonated with the recent experiences of many of our faculty and staff in the audience who are creating relevant curriculum, looking at new methodologies of delivery and assessment, experimenting, adapting teaching approaches, and going outside of current comfort zones.  It is clear that at PSU that faculty leadership has continually driven curricular change, whether 20 years ago in the creation of University Studies, or in the last year with the Provost Challenge initiatives. 

This is the 16th year Portland State has participated in Carnegie Conversations on Teaching and Learning; an initiative that began with support through the Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching to improve the quality of student learning and raise the visibility of scholarly approaches to teaching and learning.  The event this past week was the first in OAI's 2014/2015 series. See http://www.pdx.edu/oai/calendar/view/calendar  for more information on these and additional OAI campus events.

I hope the PSU conversations about the relationship and juxtaposition of formal versus experiential learning, about the use of technology, and about who our students will be in the next 15-20 years will continue.  I would be interested in hearing your thoughts on this and approaches PSU might take.

Friday, July 25, 2014

Another step in moving forward on reTHINK PSU




Last week (July 21, 2014) Vice Provost Sukhwant Jhaj and I attended the kick-off meeting in Washington DC for a Gates Foundation grant that PSU has received from the Association of Public and Land-Grant Universities (APLU) and the Urban Serving Universities (USU).  You can read about the work PSU will be engaged in related to this grant at https://www.aplu.org/page.aspx?pid=3003&srctid=1&erid=2084940

This effort is one of the first significant investments the Gates Foundation is making in universities.  Much of their (Gates Foundation) focus and funding thus far has been at the K-12 and community college levels.  At the meeting in DC, a Gates Foundation representative commented on how they now realize how important the entire educational ecosystem is; that investing in universities is an important part of that.  Of course, we all know that is true, but to have external recognition of that from an influential (and well endowed) foundation was validating for us. 

PSU was awarded one of the 7 grants because we are seen as a leader among urban serving universities in our goals to advance student success and student completion—creating access for students, making it affordable, and helping them complete their degrees.  These are the foundational goals of reTHINK PSU (http://www.rethink.pdx.edu/).  It is exciting to know that the work we have articulated in creating pathways for success for students from community colleges and creating flexible degrees that serve a range of students is seen by others as one of the important directions for the future of higher education.

Having said this, these grants do not just land at our feet and the competition for this award was fierce.  Sukhwant Jhaj and Hans VanDerSchaafer did a great job in writing a proposal that made the case for why PSU needed to be one of the 7 universities in the country that the Gates Foundation should invest in their inaugural effort to support universities.  We imagine that the work ahead of us will not always be easy.  My guess is we will run into challenges and divergent views on how to accomplish things, and we will need to make decisions at times without all the information we would like to have.  But, it is important that PSU be a leader in these efforts and influence the paths of others.

I will be writing more about this effort in upcoming blogs and welcome your thoughts on this topic and our work, now or at anytime.
 





Reducing Student Textbook Costs


Reducing Student Costs: Textbooks and Course Materials

One of the goals of reTHINK PSU is to reduce what it costs students to get a degree.  I am guessing it is not news to anyone that around the country, the cost of textbooks and other course materials have become a major contributing factor to the financial barriers faced by students.  Students at PSU are not immune to this. The College Board estimated the 2013-14 cost for textbooks and supplies for the average undergraduate to be $1207.

We at PSU think it is important to address textbook affordability as one more piece of the puzzle of reducing the cost of a degree.  Through the urging and leadership of our Library Dean, Marilyn Moody, and in collaboration with the Faculty Senate and ASPSU, we will be creating a task force in the fall to determine how PSU can lower course material costs for PSU students.

We know there are many questions as we open up the textbook/course materials cost can of worms: Can we really reduce costs when so much of the cost of published material is out of our hands?  What role will faculty need to play?  Will this be an effort to tell faculty what books/resources they can and cannot assign for their courses? Are open source materials any good? What are the technical and policy barriers to reducing textbook cost? And, I am sure there are other concerns and questions.

Our task force will be jointly appointed by the Provost, Faculty Senate and ASPSU to make sure we have all perspectives represented.  We plan to launch the task force this fall.  We will provide regular updates and a variety of ways for you to share your ideas and comments. 

Thank you and I welcome any comments or suggestions.